History

Bitcoin Block Overview

Block Height: 893746
Timestamp: 1745482361
Miner: F2Pool
Coinbase Value: 316,220,667 sats
Total Transactions: 4265
Size: 1,660,450 bytes
Weight: 3,998,329 units

This block doesn't currently hold historical significance but represents an active period in Bitcoin mining.

Key Features

There were 4,265 transactions processed, with top transaction fees leading the way. The transaction with the highest fee paid 29,760 sats, while the next highest were 24,912 sats and 20,950 sats.

Transaction Breakdown

• OP_RETURN (Data-carrying transactions): 6
• P2PKH (Legacy transactions starting with 1): 6
• P2SH (Script transactions starting with 3): 4
• V0_P2WPKH (SegWit transactions): 30
• V0_P2WSH (SegWit Script transactions): 2

In this block, you can see a diverse mix of transaction types, highlighting the various ways people engage with Bitcoin. The incorporation of OP_RETURN indicates that some transactions carried additional data within them.

Bitcoin Block Breakdown: Height 893743

This block, with a height of 893743, was mined by AntPool. It includes a coinbase value of 322,116,605 sats, which is the reward for the miner and includes fees from transactions. Interestingly, it also has OP_RETURN data being carried in the coinbase transaction.

The block timestamp indicates it was created at Unix time 1745481012, which translates to a specific date and time. Overall, this block contains a total of 3385 transactions.

Block Size and Weight

The size of the block is 1,557,792 bytes, while its weight is 3,993,714 units. These metrics are important for understanding how much space the block takes on the blockchain.

Top Transactions by Fee

Here are the top three transactions in this block based on fees paid:

1. Transaction ID: d405296faee642db6326536ac9ebd9387bf1607ffbf6143f6e3fd8bf7e4eabda - Fee: 407,100 sats
2. Transaction ID: 0703882be9d0103ad2236194226b036584e3d78ab442707359888fc6fcc3167c - Fee: 32,000 sats

Bitcoin Block Analysis: Height 893529

Block Summary:

• Height: 893529
• Timestamp: 1745337439
• Miner: F2Pool
• Coinbase Value: 316,686,105 sats
• OP_RETURN in Coinbase: Yes
• Total Transactions: 3165
• Size: 1,700,513 bytes
• Weight: 3,998,264 units

This block, mined by F2Pool, features a noteworthy coinbase value of 316,686,105 sats and includes an OP_RETURN transaction, highlighting its support for data. The block size and weight indicate a significant amount of processing and transaction activity.

Top Transactions by Fee:

1. Transaction ID: d19e752fa6cf6870827bce060347a30f691e32a098984b952dd92987dec37f85 (Fee: 32,000 sats)
2. Transaction ID: c1c108e7c568d37815c5401d56df304589386a1f5b48990172e839276fcfe486 (Fee: 32,000 sats)
3. Transaction ID: 38f741e51597f5dbb984943cbb42cecf120e35f235990e56690b5ee88ebaf5d2 (Fee: 32,000 sats)

The top transactions in this block all share the same substantial fee, indicating competitive bidding for block space.

Wallet Types Breakdown:

• OP_RETURN: Data-carrying txs: 7
• P2PKH: Legacy (starts with 1): 5
• P2SH: Script (starts with 3): 5
• V0_P2WPKH: 23
• V1_P2TR: 3

The breakdown of wallet types reflects a mix of transaction styles, including a growing number of P2WPKH (Pay to Witness Public Key Hash) transactions, demonstrating the ongoing shift towards more efficient transaction formats.

Overall, this block showcases both high transaction volume and diverse use cases within the Bitcoin blockchain, emphasizing the evolving landscape of Bitcoin transactions and miner activity.

Bitcoin Transaction Breakdown

This Bitcoin transaction has the unique identifier (TXID) 49cc79e3d776b315d5b6b4e7717de7193bf091f2b9e40b385472b7069f347efc and has been confirmed, meaning it’s officially recorded on the blockchain. It was included in block #891443 and incurred a transaction fee of 362 satoshis.

The inputs show that 42,519,448 satoshis were sent in, while the outputs indicate that 42,519,086 satoshis were sent out. This transaction consists of one input and two outputs, meaning some bitcoins were received by different wallets.

The wallets involved are categorized as v0_p2wsh (2 instances) and v0_p2wpkh (1 instance), which are different types of Bitcoin address formats. Notably, this transaction does not contain any OP_RETURN data, which is typically used for embedding messages.

Additionally, the transaction does not resemble CoinJoin or consolidation behavior, meaning it’s likely a straightforward transfer without any mixing or combining of funds. Overall, there’s nothing particularly historically significant noted about this transaction, but it illustrates a common type of Bitcoin activity.

In analyzing the Bitcoin block at height 344444, we can glean quite a bit from the data provided. This block was mined at a UNIX timestamp corresponding to late February 2015, reflecting a time when Bitcoin was undergoing significant growth and adoption.

The miner associated with this block is listed as "Unknown Miner," which is not unusual for blocks mined in this era, as many miners operated under pseudonyms or simply did not disclose their identities. The coinbase transaction in this block had a value of 2,506,294,050 satoshis, indicating a reward for the miner that included the typical block reward along with any transaction fees collected from the included transactions.

With a total of 438 transactions in this block, which is a relatively high count, we can see that the Bitcoin network was becoming increasingly active. The block size at 242,032 bytes and weight at 968,128 units also show that it was efficiently packed with data, owing to the mixture of transaction types and values.

Notably, there were no OP_RETURN outputs in the coinbase, suggesting that this block did not contain any scripts for data storage, which might have been more common in later blocks as developers began using Bitcoin for innovative purposes beyond mere transactions.

When it comes to the transaction fees, it's interesting to highlight the top three transactions. The highest fee of 150,000 satoshis for the transaction with ID 0c4da258ac0690e93f2b696a4055b74a445840d3ddea2937096c4110fbd685c5 indicates a strong incentive for miners to include certain transactions, likely due to time-sensitive transfers or high-value transactions.

Regarding wallet types, the breakdown shows that there are mostly legacy Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash (P2PKH) transactions, making up 41 transactions. Only one Pay-to-Script-Hash (P2SH) transaction was recorded. This indicates that advanced wallet types, such as SegWit and Taproot, were not utilized in this block, as they had not yet been broadly adopted or even implemented at this time. The absence of SegWit is particularly salient, as it later became a critical upgrade for the Bitcoin network aimed at increasing efficiency and reducing fees.

In conclusion, this block serves as a snapshot of the Bitcoin blockchain in 2015, illustrating the transition from simpler transaction types to more complex and efficient systems in the years that followed, paving the way for innovations in how Bitcoin is used today.